Financially reviewed by Patrick Flood, CFA.
Leveraged ETFs allow investors to increase exposure without additional capital outlays. Below we'll explore what leveraged ETFs are, how they work, and why you might want to use them.
Disclosure: Some of the links on this page are referral links. At no additional cost to you, if you choose to make a purchase or sign up for a service after clicking through those links, I may receive a small commission. This allows me to continue producing high-quality content on this site and pays for the occasional cup of coffee. I have first-hand experience with every product or service I recommend, and I recommend them because I genuinely believe they are useful, not because of the commission I may get. Read more here.
Contents
What Is a Leveraged ETF?
A leveraged ETF, as the name suggests, is an ETF (exchange-traded fund) that allows investors to utilize leverage in their portfolio. Leverage simply refers to increasing investment exposure without additional capital outlays. Thus, leveraged ETFs allow you to use leverage without taking on margin, and at degrees greater than what a margin loan would allow.
For example, a 2x leveraged ETF that tracks the S&P 500 seeks to provide 200% of the daily return of the underlying index. That is, if the index increases in value by 5%, the 2x leveraged ETF should increase by 10%. For a 2x leveraged ETF, “2x” and “200%” and “2:1” all refer to the same thing: the leverage ratio. It's not all upside, though. Similarly, if the index falls by 5%, the leveraged ETF falls by 10%. As such, leveraged ETFs provide the potential for greater returns but also the potential for greater losses.
There are leveraged ETFs of many different leverage ratios available for many different indexes, e.g. 2x the S&P 500, 3x the NASDAQ-100, etc.
Now that you know what a leveraged ETF is, let's explore how leveraged ETFs work.
How Do Leveraged ETFs Work?
Leveraged ETFs utilize debt and swaps to attempt to deliver their stated price movement. This borrowing increases transaction costs and management fees of leveraged ETFs. Their expense ratios are usually considerably higher than those of “normal,” unleveraged ETFs. Still, leveraged ETFs are still usually a cheaper form of applying leverage than margin, a collateralized loan from your investment broker. Leveraged ETFs also allow investors to maintain a constant leverage ratio and to avoid margin calls.
Leveraged ETFs are popular among day traders aiming to capitalize on momentum or earnings announcements. There are also inverse leveraged ETFs (-2x and -3x), allowing traders to profit from bear markets, providing what's called a short position. Because of their complex nature involving swaps, debt, and daily rebalancing, leveraged ETFs are likely only appropriate for experienced investors with a high risk tolerance.
Also note that the daily resetting of leveraged ETFs means the fund only provides the stated percentage return relative to the underlying index on a daily basis, not necessarily over the long term. Because of this, volatility of the index can eat away at gains; this is known as volatility decay or beta slippage.
Volatility decay is the boogeyman cited ad nauseam by financial bloggers and analysts as the reason that leveraged ETFs are inarguably unsuitable for holding as long-term investments. And while it's definitely important to understand the potential pitfalls of leverage and the nature of the evil-sounding “volatility decay,” this intrinsic compounding also works in the opposite direction. If the underlying index moves up consistently with decent momentum, volatility decay actually works in your favor. This is why UPRO, the 3x leveraged S&P 500 ETF, has delivered close to 5x the returns of the index since its inception instead of the proposed 3x.
If you’re curious to see the math, I would encourage you to check out this page. It's also actually been proposed that investors should not only diversify across assets but also across time, employing leverage early in one's investing horizon to reduce risk near retirement. I myself utilize long-term leverage in my own portfolio with funds like NTSX (1.5x 60/40), UPRO (3x S&P 500), and TMF (3x long-term treasury bonds).
Now that you know how leveraged ETFs work, let's look at how one might use them in an investment portfolio.
Conclusion – How To Use Leveraged ETFs
Liquidity is an important factor when choosing leveraged ETFs, as low-volume leveraged ETFs are often at risk of closure, and most investors don't hold them long-term.
Again, leveraged ETFs can be used for swing trading, trend following, earnings announcements, or possibly long-term holding if you're so inclined. They may even allow you to beat the market. To see some long-term leveraged ETF strategies in action, check out the Hedgefundie strategy and my designs of a leveraged All Weather Portfolio and leveraged Permanent Portfolio.
I reviewed some of the best leveraged ETFs here.
Thankfully, buying a leveraged ETF is as simple as placing a buy order like with any other security. Most leveraged ETFs are available at M1 Finance. M1 is an ideal choice of broker to use leveraged ETFs because they feature dynamic rebalancing of new deposits and one-click manual rebalancing. These features are extremely useful, as the volatile movement of leveraged ETFs means they can quickly stray from their target allocations. The broker also has zero trade commissions and zero account fees, and offers fractional shares, dynamic rebalancing, and a sleek, user-friendly interface and mobile app. I wrote a comprehensive review of M1 Finance here.
Be sure to read up on the potential pitfalls of using leverage before blindly buying in. Again, leveraged ETFs are better suited for experienced investors. Remember that using leverage – especially in the form of leveraged ETFs – increases portfolio risk and the potential for greater returns, but also the potential for greater losses. Do your own due diligence and read the fine print on these products.
Do you employ leveraged ETFs in your portfolio? Let me know in the comments.
Disclosures: I am long NTSX, UPRO, and TMF.
Interested in more Lazy Portfolios? See the full list here.
Disclaimer: While I love diving into investing-related data and playing around with backtests, this is not financial advice, investing advice, or tax advice. The information on this website is for informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only. Investment products discussed (ETFs, mutual funds, etc.) are for illustrative purposes only. It is not a research report. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or otherwise transact in any of the products mentioned. I always attempt to ensure the accuracy of information presented but that accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Do your own due diligence. I mention M1 Finance a lot around here. M1 does not provide investment advice, and this is not an offer or solicitation of an offer, or advice to buy or sell any security, and you are encouraged to consult your personal investment, legal, and tax advisors. Hypothetical examples used, such as historical backtests, do not reflect any specific investments, are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be considered an offer to buy or sell any products. All investing involves risk, including the risk of losing the money you invest. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of other parties mentioned. Read my lengthier disclaimer here.
Are you nearing or in retirement? Use my link here to get a free holistic financial plan and to take advantage of 25% exclusive savings on financial planning and wealth management services from fiduciary advisors at Retirable to manage your savings, spend smarter, and navigate key decisions.
Rich says
Hi John,
Wondering what the distinct differences are between UPRO and SPXL? Is one funds method of achieving 3x better than the other? Would these work as TLH partners? Was also looking at using a 50/50 mix of MIDU/UDOW as a proxy. Thanks for your insight!
John Williamson says
Hey Rich, basically UPRO is slightly cheaper and more liquid. They may or may not be “substantially identical” because they use the same index and do the same thing.
Michael Saenz says
Hi John!
Excellent article. I have a question- are borrowing fees incorporated into the management fee?
I want to know the effective fees I am paying for in total.
(Theoretical example of a 2x leveraged fund)
Is it 1% management fee PLUS overnight borrowing rate of 4% APR for a total of 5% annual in fees?
Similarly, would a 3x fund be 1% management fees, then 2 * 4% APR for a total of 9% annual in fees?
If so, I may have to think twice before I put my money into a 3x levered fund!
Jake says
Hi John,
Great articles on leveraged ETFs. After reading most of your articles on this topic I fell well informed 🙂 There’s just a question that I am still trying to figure out:
I know from your articles that you hold some leveraged ETFs long-term. Due to the inherent risk of leveraged ETFs as you have been discussing, I wonder what exit strategy/ies one should consider.
As said, I know you hold these long-term, but is this “long-term” different from your other long-term normal ETF’s exit strategies? I.e. do you plan to exit the leveraged ETFs before your normal ETFs? Or will you hold the leveraged ETFs just as long as your normal ETFs?
Basically, what strategy/ies do you apply to your own leveraged ETFs? How long do you plan to hold them? Will you take profit at certain levels to cover your risk? Etc.
Many thanks.
John Williamson says
If the LETFs allow me to hit my retirement number early, I’d cash them out completely. Once you win the game, stop playing.
Jake says
Thanks for the reply.
1)
So basically you are saying that your exit strategy is to hold your LETFs until retirement (let’s just assume standard retirement around 60-70 years old), unless your retirement number is hit earlier than that age?
2)
You won’t take any profits/scale-out a long the way?
John Williamson says
Correct and correct.
Henry Jones says
Thanks for your great info! Unlike non-leveraged treasury ETFs such as TLT or EDV, it seems that TMF provides almost zero income/interest distributions. I’m wondering whether the results of your simulated back tests (to year 1987) of the 3X Leveraged All Weather Portfolio and Hedgefundie Excellent Adventure accounted for this important distinction between using TMF versus non-leveraged treasury ETFs long-term?
Also, do you employ the 40/60 or 55/45 version of HFEA in your own portfolio?
Thank you!
John Williamson says
They do. TMF does have a distribution yield.
My HFEA play is roughly 60/40.
K says
Are there any operational risks at the fund level to be aware of when investing in a long term strategy using LETFs? I’m comfortable with the idea of allocating a small portion of my portfolio to a leveraged all weather or UPRO/TMF strategy but is there any risk these leverage products could collapse or be forced into liquidation during adverse market conditions?
John Williamson says
Absolutely. Risk of closure. Happens all the time.
K says
How would you view this risk if investing in UPRO/TMF with a 10 or 20 year horizon? Can a large enough draw down in the underlying cause an LETF to collapse like what happened to VIX ETPs a few years ago?
John Williamson says
Those are 2 of the most liquid ones out there. Can’t know the future.
A. says
I followed the link to see the math behind leveraged ETFs, but the server that it points to (ddnum.com) is not reacheable.
John Williamson says
That page does seem to go down a lot. Maybe try again in 24 hours. Maybe I’ll see if I can save a local copy somehow.