Golden Butterfly Portfolio Review and M1 Finance ETF Pie

Financially reviewed by Patrick Flood, CFA.

The Golden Butterfly Portfolio is a medium-risk portfolio similar to Ray Dalio's All Weather Portfolio. Here we'll look at its components and the best ETF's to use in its construction.

Interested in more Lazy Portfolios? See the full list here.

Disclosure:  Some of the links on this page are referral links. At no additional cost to you, if you choose to make a purchase or sign up for a service after clicking through those links, I may receive a small commission. This allows me to continue producing high-quality, ad-free content on this site and pays for the occasional cup of coffee. I have first-hand experience with every product or service I recommend, and I recommend them because I genuinely believe they are useful, not because of the commission I get if you decide to purchase through my links. Read more here.

Golden Butterfly Portfolio Review Video

Prefer video? Watch it here.

What Is the Golden Butterfly Portfolio?

The Golden Butterfly Portfolio is essentially a modified version of the Permanent Portfolio. It was designed by Tyler of PortfolioCharts.com. Its asset allocation looks like this:

• 20% Total US Stock Market
• 20% US Small Cap Value
• 20% Long-Term Treasury Bonds
• 20% Short-Term Treasury Bonds
• 20% Gold

Tyler maintains that the Golden Butterfly Portfolio “goes against conventional investing wisdom.” I wouldn't really go that far. We know that Small Cap Value has historically paid a risk premium and gets us exposure to the Size and Value factors, small- and mid-caps have beaten large-caps historically, short-term treasury bonds are a cash equivalent, and long-term treasury bonds tend to be the best diversifier to hold alongside stocks (and thus are usually a very good hedge/insurance for a stock crash).

The only real point of contention in my opinion is the pretty heavy allocation to gold. I'm personally not a big fan of gold. It has a nonnegative correlation to stocks, albeit low/small, is much more volatile than bonds, is not a value-producing asset (it has a real expected return of zero), and has not been a reliable inflation hedge historically. That said, gold is typically uncorrelated to both stocks and bonds, offering a diversification benefit to lower the portfolio's volatility and risk. Basically, we'd expect to sacrifice some return for a lower risk profile. This may be a perfectly sensible and desirable tradeoff for the risk-averse investor.

Your excitement – or lack thereof – over gold also depends on your view of monetary policy. I'm personally of the mind that monetary policy in the United States is fundamentally different post-Volcker (1982), in that we now know which levers to pull and which levers not to pull in order to avoid a runaway inflationary environment like we saw in the late 1970's, when bonds suffered and gold did well.

I would argue that for a young investor with a long time horizon and a high tolerance for risk, holding gold only creates the opportunity cost of holding something else in its place with greater expected returns, like more stocks. That said, again, I'll concede that it may offer a short-term diversification benefit and the metal does seem to reliably hedge against currency devaluation, making for safer withdrawal rates in retirement, so adopting the Golden Butterfly Portfolio may very well be a prudent move at or near retirement, or for a risk-averse investor who wants to cover all bases for all environments to minimize volatility and risk.

Golden Butterfly Portfolio vs. Permanent Portfolio

The premise of the Permanent Portfolio is to utilize assets that perform well in four economic conditions: expansion (stocks), recession (cash or short-term bonds), inflation (gold; debatable), and deflation (long-term treasury bonds). The Golden Butterfly Portfolio simply takes those same assets and specifically adds Small Cap Value, a move that I'm a fan of. This invariably makes it comparatively more “aggressive” than the Permanent Portfolio, but we're still talking about a relatively low-volatility, all-seasons portfolio. Adding small-cap value conveniently means greater expected returns and a diversification benefit from the Size and Value factors being lowly correlated to market risk (beta).

In taking up a larger stocks position, we're also tilting toward an expansionary economic environment. I'm definitely okay with this; the economy grows more than it declines. Your adoption thereof may depend on your economic outlook.

Here's a backtest from 1978 through July, 2021 comparing the Golden Butterfly Portfolio and the Permanent Portfolio:

As we'd expect, going back to 1978, we see a greater CAGR and Sharpe (risk-adjusted return) for the Golden Butterfly, with slightly more volatility and a larger drawdown. This is due again to its inclusion of small cap value stocks. Looking at the Sharpe ratios, a measure of risk-adjusted return, we can see that we were better compensated per unit of risk by going with the Golden Butterfly Portfolio.

I'd definitely take the Golden Butterfly over the Permanent Portfolio. Again, I like small cap value stocks, and I don't want the Permanent Portfolio's extra 5% in gold.

Golden Butterfly Portfolio vs. All Weather Portfolio

Compared to Ray Dalio's All Weather Portfolio, we're talking about more gold, more stocks, and less treasuries. Like the All Weather, the Golden Butterfly Portfolio is designed to “weather” any storm by utilizing diversification.

As mentioned, the Golden Butterfly Portfolio tilts toward economic expansion. Dalio chooses to be a little more market-agnostic with the All Weather Portfolio, admitting that we don't know what the future will hold. Unfortunately, while this provides a lower risk profile similar to the Permanent Portfolio, it has tended to drag down the portfolio's returns a bit over the long term, particularly due to its inclusion of broad commodities.

With data for Commodities funds only going back to 2002, here's what the comparison looks like from then through July, 2021:

Results have been very close for that time period. Just like we saw with the Permanent Portfolio, with the Golden Butterfly we have a very slightly higher risk profile, but we're compensated for that greater risk in the form of higher general and risk-adjusted returns.

Let's explore an alternative. If you're like me, you might replace Commodities (they're pretty awful) in the All Weather Portfolio with Utilities (I delved into this here). Making that substitution, we can get data going back to 1993, and the results are pretty different:

Results have been neck and neck for that time period in terms of return. The All Weather came out with a significantly smaller max drawdown and slightly lower volatility to deliver a higher risk-adjusted return. But in fairness, the Size and Value factors have also suffered greatly over the decade 2010-2019, which didn't bode well for the Golden Butterfly for that time period, and the past 40 years have also been very kind to the All Weather's greater allocation to and longer duration of bonds.

Golden Butterfly Portfolio ETFs for M1 Finance

M1 Finance is a great choice of broker for U.S. investors to implement the Golden Butterfly Portfolio because it makes regular rebalancing seamless and easy, and it has zero transaction fees. I wrote a comprehensive review of M1 Finance here.

Utilizing mostly low-cost Vanguard funds, we can construct the Golden Butterfly Portfolio pie with the following ETF's:

• VTI – 20%
• VIOV – 20%
• VGLT – 20%
• VGSH – 20%
• SGOL – 20%

You can add this pie to your portfolio on M1 Finance by clicking this link and then clicking “Add to Portfolio.”

Canadians can find the above ETFs on Questrade or Interactive Brokers. Investors outside North America can use eToro or possibly Interactive Brokers.

Taking the Golden Butterfly Portfolio International

You may have noticed a glaring problem with the Golden Butterfly Portfolio: it only uses U.S. assets and has no international exposure. That's almost certainly suboptimal, especially considering its whole purpose is to reduce volatility and risk. Taking the stocks global, the portfolio and subsequent pie then look like this:

• VT (world stock market) – 20%
• VIOV (US small cap value) – 10%
• AVDV (int'l small cap value) – 10%
• VGLT – 20%
• VGSH – 20%
• SGOL – 20%

You can add this pie to your portfolio on M1 Finance by clicking this link and then clicking “Add to Portfolio.”

Canadians can find the above ETFs on Questrade or Interactive Brokers. Investors outside North America can use eToro or possibly Interactive Brokers.

Modified Golden Butterfly Portfolio

A “Modified Golden Butterfly Portfolio” emerged on the Bogleheads forum in mid-2017. Of course, anyone can create their own “modified” version of any portfolio. The one proposed combines my above suggestion of diversifying internationally with equities and avoiding gold, choosing instead to use TIPS and REITs as direct inflation hedges:

• 20% Total World Stock Market
• 20% Total World Small Cap Value
• 20% Long-Term Bonds
• 20% Short-Term Bonds
• 10% TIPS
• 10% REITs

Using mostly low-cost Vanguard funds, we can construct this Modified Golden Butterfly Portfolio as follows. At the time of writing, since there's no ETF available for global small cap value, I'm using half U.S. small cap value and half international small-cap value.

• VT – 20%
• VIOV – 10%
• AVDV – 10%
• VGLT – 20%
• VGSH – 20%
• SCHP – 10%
• VNQ – 10%

You can add this pie to your portfolio on M1 Finance by clicking this link and then clicking “Add to Portfolio.”

Canadians can find the above ETFs on Questrade or Interactive Brokers. Investors outside North America can use eToro or possibly Interactive Brokers.

Leveraged Golden Butterfly Portfolio

We can't construct a leveraged Golden Butterfly Portfolio that matches the base portfolio perfectly because there are no leveraged ETFs available for short-term bonds or small-cap value stocks. However, holding 20% long-term bonds and 20% short-term bonds is roughly the same thing as holding 40% intermediate-term bonds. We can also combine the 2 20% stocks positions to a single 40% position to track the S&P 500.

The next issue is that there are now no 3x gold ETFs available. Using 3x leverage on intermediate-term treasury bonds and 3x leverage on the S&P 500 for stocks, we can roughly match the intended exposure ratio with the following allocations:

36% 3x stocks
36% 3x interm. treasury bonds
28% 2x gold

This leveraged Golden Butterfly Portfolio essentially becomes a variant of Hedgefundie's Excellent Adventure with a heavy allocation to gold.

Remember that using leverage – especially in the form of leveraged ETFs – increases portfolio risk and the potential for greater returns, but also the potential for greater losses. Do your own due diligence before blindly buying leveraged funds, and read the fine print on these products. They can potentially be extremely dangerous. I talked a bit more about leveraged ETFs and how they work here.

Below is a backtest showing how this portfolio would have performed vs. the S&P 500 and a 60/40 portfolio historically:

Notice this portfolio would have achieved much higher returns historically with volatility not too much greater than an S&P 500 index fund, and with smaller drawdowns. This portfolio even achieved a greater risk-adjusted return than a classic 60/40 portfolio.

Using popular leveraged ETFs from ProShares and Direxion, we can construct this leveraged Golden Butterfly Portfolio as follows:

UPRO – 36%
TYD – 36%
UGL – 28%

You can add this pie to your portfolio on M1 Finance by clicking this link and then clicking “Add to Portfolio.”

---

Don't want to do all this investing stuff yourself or feel overwhelmed? Check out my flat-fee-only fiduciary friends over at Advisor.com.

Disclosures: I am long VTI and UPRO in my own portfolio.

Interested in more Lazy Portfolios? See the full list here.

Disclaimer:  While I love diving into investing-related data and playing around with backtests, this is not financial advice, investing advice, or tax advice. The information on this website is for informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only. Investment products discussed (ETFs, mutual funds, etc.) are for illustrative purposes only. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or otherwise transact in any of the products mentioned. I always attempt to ensure the accuracy of information presented but that accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Do your own due diligence. All investing involves risk, including the risk of losing the money you invest. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of other parties mentioned. Read my lengthier disclaimer here.