• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Optimized Portfolio

Investing and Personal Finance

  • Beginners Start Here
  • Investing 101
    • Beginners Start Here – 10 Steps To Start Building Wealth
    • What Is the Stock Market? How It Works & How to Invest in It
    • How To Invest in an Index Fund – The Best Index Funds
    • Portfolio Asset Allocation by Age
    • Portfolio Diversification – How To Diversify Your Portfolio
    • Dollar Cost Averaging vs. Lump Sum Investing (DCA vs. LSI)
    • How To Invest Your HSA (Health Savings Account)
    • How To Invest Your Emergency Fund
    • Factor Investing and Factor ETFs – The Ultimate Guide
    • Why and How To Buy Bonds Online: A Guide for Beginners
    • 8 Reasons Why I’m Not a Dividend Income Investor
  • Lazy Portfolios
    • All Weather Portfolio
    • Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio
    • Warren Buffett Portfolio
    • HEDGEFUNDIE’s Excellent Adventure
    • Golden Butterfly Portfolio
    • Permanent Portfolio
    • David Swensen Portfolio
    • 60/40 Portfolio
    • more…
  • Brokerage Reviews
    • The 5 Best Stock Brokers
    • The 4 Best Investing Apps
    • M1 Finance Review
    • M1 Finance vs. Fidelity
    • M1 Finance vs. Vanguard
    • Stash vs. Robinhood
    • Investing Brokers with the Lowest Margin Rates
    • M1 Borrow Review (How M1’s Margin Loan Works)
  • ETFs
    • VIG vs. VYM – Comparing Vanguard’s 2 Popular Dividend ETF’s
    • The 11 Best Dividend ETFs
    • The 7 Best Small Cap Value ETFs
    • The 5 Best REIT ETFs
    • The 5 Best Tech ETFs
    • The 6 Best ETFs for Taxable Accounts
    • The Best Vanguard Bond Funds – 11 Popular ETFs
    • The Best Vanguard Dividend Funds – 4 Popular ETFs
    • The Best Vanguard Growth Funds – 5 Popular ETFs
    • 6 Best ESG ETFs for Responsible Investing
    • The 7 Best International ETFs
  • Leverage
    • What Is a Leveraged ETF and How Do They Work?
    • How To Beat the Market Using Leverage and Index Investing
    • The 9 Best Leveraged ETFs
    • Hedgefundie’s Excellent Adventure
    • Leveraged All Weather Portfolio
    • Leveraged Permanent Portfolio
    • Leveraged Golden Butterfly Portfolio
  • Dividends
    • The Best M1 Finance Dividend Pie
    • The 11 Best Dividend ETFs
    • The Best Vanguard Dividend Funds – 4 Popular ETFs
    • VIG vs. VYM – Comparing Vanguard’s 2 Popular Dividend ETF’s
    • 8 Reasons Why I’m Not a Dividend Income Investor
    • Bonds
      • How To Buy Bonds Online: The Ultimate Guide
      • Treasury Bonds vs. Corporate Bonds
      • The Best Vanguard Bond Funds – 11 Popular ETFs
      • The Best Bond Funds Out There – 13 ETFs
      • The 11 Best Treasury Bond ETFs
      • The 5 Best High Yield Bond Funds for Income
      • The 3 Best Corporate Bond ETFs
      • The 3 Best Municipal Bond ETFs
      • The 3 Best TIPS ETFs
  • Credit
    • How To Raise Your Credit Score Fast
    • How To Consolidate Credit Card Debt
    • How To Refinance Your Car Loan
    • How To Shop for a Mortgage
    • 9 Tips To Lower Your Car Insurance Premiums

Sequence of Return Risk in Retirement Explained

Last Updated: April 9, 2021 No Comments – 7 min. read

Sequence of return risk may very well ruin your financial retirement plans, and all from sheer bad luck. Here we’ll look at the nature and implications of sequence of return risk in retirement, and some proposed solutions to at least mitigate its potential negative impact.

Disclosure:  Some of the links on this page are referral links. At no additional cost to you, if you choose to make a purchase or sign up for a service after clicking through those links, I may receive a small commission. This allows me to continue producing high-quality, ad-free content on this site and pays for the occasional cup of coffee. I have first-hand experience with every product or service I recommend, and I recommend them because I genuinely believe they are useful, not because of the commission I get if you decide to purchase through my links. Read more here.

Contents

  • What Is Sequence of Return Risk?
  • The Potential Upside of Sequence Risk
  • Sequence of Return Risk Charts
  • Sequence of Return Risk and Asset Types
  • Mitigating Sequence of Return Risk – Possible Solutions
  • Using a Withdrawal Policy Statement
  • Conclusion

What Is Sequence of Return Risk?

Sequence of return refers to the variability of year-to-year market returns. The “risk” thereof specifically refers to how the timing of withdrawals during retirement can negatively impact the value and viability of the portfolio going forward. 

At retirement, you are likely no longer making contributions and are instead withdrawing money each year. Since these withdrawals don’t get replenished by new contributions, the sequence of your returns matters. Withdrawals hurt the future portfolio value more in bear markets and less during bull markets, as you are withdrawing proportionally more during the former and proportionally less during the latter. The combination of withdrawing and poor portfolio performance may deplete it so much that you later exhaust the retirement savings that are left.

Markets are largely unpredictable. The expected average annualized return of your investment portfolio is not going to happen every single year. The long-term averaging out or “self correcting” of the stock market doesn’t help over a short period like 5 to 10 years, during which sequence of return risk may ruin the rest of your retirement. In short, if you get a “bad sequence” of returns at the beginning of your retirement, you may run out of money later, and your planned safe withdrawal rate is no longer safe.

Since all crystal balls are cloudy, the type of sequence you get is unfortunately simply a matter of luck. Maybe the best examples of getting the bad luck of a “bad sequence” would be someone entering retirement in 2000 at the height of the Dotcom Bubble or in 2008 at the start of the Global Financial Crisis.

The famous “4% rule” as a safe withdrawal rate estimate for retirement planning was born of this sequence risk.

The Potential Upside of Sequence Risk

It’s not all bad news, though. On the flip side, starting retirement with a “good sequence” of returns means you’ll have more money – in fact, much more – than you expected later in retirement, allowing you to sail along unscathed and worry-free and providing the ability to spend more.

Interestingly, the potential impact is asymmetrical and favors the upside. That is, due to the power of compounding during bull markets, the magnitude of potential benefit from starting with a “good sequence” outweighs the magnitude of the potential detriment of starting with a “bad sequence.” In short, a good sequence provides more “good” than a bad sequence provides “bad.”

Michael Kitces, famous financial advisor and retirement researcher, notes how the extremely wide possibility of outcomes from different sequences dictates that investors still withdraw conservatively and smartly “just in case,” even though there exists the potential for massive upside. He explains:

…on average a 4% initial withdrawal rate results in the retiree finishing with nearly triple the original principal, on top of sustaining an initial withdrawal rate of 4% adjusted annually for inflation! In fact, in only 10% of the scenarios does the retiree even finish with less than 100% of their starting principal (and in only one of those scenarios does the final value run all the way down to having nothing at the end, which of course is what defines the 4% initial withdrawal as “safe” in the first place).

As usual, hope for the best but plan for the worst.

Sequence of Return Risk Charts

The graph below illustrates the above points – that even with the same average annual return, the investor entering retirement in a bull market is far better off later than the investor who enters retirement during a bear market – for a hypothetical scenario:

sequence of return risk chart
Source: RetireOne.com

Here’s a chart for the same data:

sequence of return risk chart 2
Source: RetireOne.com

The graph below illustrates how the two sides of the luck coin have played out historically using the empirical data:

sequence of returns graph

Kitces illustrates the dangerous implications of what’s shown above – that even bumping up to just a 5% withdrawal rate (from 4%) fails 25% of the time in historical scenarios with a 60/40 portfolio:

terminal value of portfolio

Kitces also illustrates the wide variability of possible outcomes and potential upside of sequence risk:

sequence risk upside

Sequence of Return Risk and Asset Types

Naturally, assets like treasury bonds – especially those of shorter durations – have comparatively less sequence of return risk than things like stocks, gold, and real estate. That is, the year-to-year returns of bonds are more predictable and less volatile than the latter assets. On the extremes, the risk-free asset (1-month T Bills) has zero sequence risk and leveraged equities have the most sequence risk.

Bonds are typically increasingly added as time passes for precisely that reason, to decrease the portfolio’s overall volatility and risk. This is why diversification becomes more important near retirement in favor of capital preservation over massive gains. A young investor with a 30-year time horizon can afford to be – and arguably should be – invested in 100% stocks precisely because they don’t need to worry about sequence risk early in the accumulation phase, during which they’re also likely not making any withdrawals. That is, young investors can afford to have bad years – and even strings of consecutively bad years – from which their portfolio can later recover. A retiree doesn’t have that luxury.

Mitigating Sequence of Return Risk – Possible Solutions

A seemingly obvious answer to reduce sequence risk is to try to change the portfolio in anticipation of market behavior, known colloquially as market timing. Unfortunately, the evidence tells us this doesn’t really work, and market timing is actually usually more harmful than helpful.

Another obvious solution is to simply work a few more a years to increase the starting value of the portfolio entering retirement, but that doesn’t sound fun.

So what about tackling spending and how that affects withdrawals?

The first idea is to simply cut expenses during bad market years to save money so that you can live normally when the market recovers. 

A more involved, likely more optimal approach is to use specific decision criteria like Jonathan Guyton’s “guardrails” to indicate when to pull back on withdrawals and spending. If your withdrawal percentage is creeping up naturally, i.e. your portfolio’s value is decreasing to where your necessary withdrawal amount to cover expenses is increasing as a percentage of portfolio value, then cut expenses. 

For example, with a portfolio value of $1,000,000 and annual living expenses of $40,000, you have a 4% withdrawal rate, said to be a pretty safe estimator for retirement planning. If your portfolio value dips to $900,000, your $40,000 in expenses now comprise 4.4% of the portfolio’s value. The retiree may decide to cut expenses if their withdrawal rate reaches 5%, for example, and give themselves a raise if their withdrawal rate reaches 3%. This is likely a more sensible approach than simply letting market performance per se dictate spending.

Kitces maintains that what’s objectively even better than that is to make small, permanent cuts to expenses where you can. This invariably decreases the withdrawal percentage and permanently improves the portfolio value through compounding in future years when you still don’t have that particular expense. Due to the power of compounding, he suggests that these small cuts in expenses are ironically more impactful over the rest of the retirement horizon than the aforementioned larger but temporary cuts.

Recent research from Michael Kitces and Wade Pfau suggests that a tactical asset allocation strategy layered on top of this variable spending criteria idea can further mitigate sequence risk by doing the precise opposite of the traditional wisdom – getting more aggressive by allocating more to stocks as your retirement progresses. 

Sounds crazy, right? The traditional wisdom that seems perfectly intuitive is a declining equity glidepath, which says to decrease risk by allocating more to bonds as time goes on. The idea to do the opposite is not as farfetched as it may seem at first glance. Given the “bad” scenario of a market downturn at the beginning of one’s retirement that recovers later, the research from Kitces suggests that on average, it is better to be more in stocks later to ride that recovery back up, rather than crashing with mostly stocks (which will hurt worse) and recovering with mostly bonds (which will recover less of the portfolio’s value). 

This is perhaps a difficult concept to accept and put into practice, but Kitces suggests you can easily do this by simply being more conservative than you already would be when going into retirement, and then titrate up in equities to be slightly less conservative as time goes on. He’s not at all advocating that retirees should be shifting to 100% equities. 

A realistic example would be going into retirement with something ultra-conservative like 30/70 stocks/bonds and then gradually moving to 50/50 or whatever your “normal” risk tolerance would allow. As he puts it, “shelter in the bond tent” for the first 10 years, spend it down, and then “get back to normal” with the portfolio you would have had in the first place as you emerge.

Using a Withdrawal Policy Statement

The aforementioned criteria and tactics could be put into a Withdrawal Policy Statement (WPS) that establishes strict parameters for how portfolio withdrawals will be handled, similar to how an Investment Policy Statement (IPS) establishes guidelines for how the portfolio’s investments will be handled on an ongoing basis. 

These Statements help eliminate any emotional, knee-jerk reactions to market fluctuations that will likely be more harmful than helpful. They also eliminate needless stress over uncontrollable, unpredictable market volatility, as well as the subsequent worry about whether or not you’re doing the right thing with the portfolio based on that volatility. Without adherence to these parameters and clear thresholds, you are likely to make more short-term adjustments to the portfolio and may miss the forest for the trees. Setting parameters means market fluctuations are only actionable if they exceed the bounds you’ve set for the portfolio’s value, withdrawal percentage, etc. Simply having the plan makes it easier to follow the plan.

Conclusion

Sequence of return risk is often overlooked and can potentially be massively detrimental to your financial retirement plans. Understand the risks of a “bad sequence” when entering retirement and establish a strategy to mitigate it, all while hoping for some good luck and a “good” sequence.

Do you employ tactics to reduce sequence risk? Let me know in the comments.


Disclaimer:  While I love diving into investing-related data and playing around with backtests, I am in no way a certified expert. I have no formal financial education. I am not a financial advisor, portfolio manager, or accountant. This is not financial advice, investing advice, or tax advice. The information on this website is for informational and recreational purposes only. Investment products discussed (ETFs, mutual funds, etc.) are for illustrative purposes only. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or otherwise transact in any of the products mentioned. Do your own due diligence. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. Read my lengthier disclaimer here.

m1 finance get started

Related Posts

  • ESG Investing – Going Socially Responsible in Your Portfolio
  • Beginners Start Here – 10 Steps To Start Building Wealth
  • Factor Investing and Factor ETFs – The Ultimate Guide
  • No, Covered Call Options Are Not a Free Lunch
  • Treasury Bonds vs. Corporate Bonds – The Showdown

About John Williamson

Analytical and entrepreneurial-minded data nerd, usability enthusiast, Boglehead, and Oxford comma advocate. I lead the Paid Search marketing efforts at Gild Group. I'm not a big fan of social media, but you can find me on LinkedIn and Reddit.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Most Popular

Ray Dalio All Weather Portfolio Review, ETF’s, & Leverage

HEDGEFUNDIE’s Excellent Adventure (UPRO/TMF) – A Summary

Golden Butterfly Portfolio Review and M1 Finance ETF Pie

The David Swensen Portfolio Review and ETF Pie for M1 Finance

Harry Browne Permanent Portfolio Review, ETFs, & Leverage

Treasury Bonds vs. Corporate Bonds – The Showdown

VIG vs. VYM – Comparing Vanguard’s 2 Popular Dividend ETFs

The Warren Buffett Portfolio Review and ETF Pie for M1 Finance

The 60/40 Portfolio Review and ETF Pie for M1 Finance

Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio Review and Vanguard ETFs To Use

Paul Merriman Ultimate Buy and Hold Portfolio Review, M1 Pie

Brokers With the Lowest Margin Rates (2021 Comparison)

M1 Finance vs. Vanguard Brokerage Comparison [2021 Review]

M1 Finance vs. Fidelity Brokerage Comparison [2021 Review]

The Best M1 Finance Dividend Pie for FIRE & Income Investors

Stash vs. Robinhood Brokerage Comparison (2021 Review)

Portfolio Asset Allocation by Age – Beginners To Retirees

The 5 Best Stock Brokers Online for Investing (2021 Review)

The 4 Best Investing Apps for Beginners (2021 Review)

The 8 Best Small Cap ETFs (4 From Vanguard) for 2021

The 5 Best REIT ETFs To Invest in Real Estate for 2021

The 5 Best Tech ETFs To Get in on the Technology Boom (2021)

The 6 Best Clean Energy ETFs To Go Green in Your Portfolio

The 10 Best Small Cap Value ETFs (3 From Vanguard) for 2021

Why, How, & Where To Invest Your Emergency Fund To Beat Inflation

401k Max Contribution Calculator for Front Loading Each Year

6 Best ESG ETFs for Responsible Investing (2 From Vanguard)

ESG Investing – Going Socially Responsible in Your Portfolio

Factor Investing and Factor ETFs – The Ultimate Guide

Dollar Cost Averaging vs. Lump Sum Investing (DCA vs. LSI)

Portfolio Diversification – How To Diversify Your Portfolio

m1 sidebar

Footer

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Reddit

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure

OptimizedPortfolio.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive email updates when a new post is published.

Don't worry, I hate spam too. No ads.

Copyright © 2021 OptimizedPortfolio.com


About - My Toolbox - Privacy - Terms - Contact

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Ok, Got ItReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT