• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Optimized Portfolio

Investing and Personal Finance

  • Start Here
  • Investing 101
    • Beginners Start Here – 10 Steps To Start Building Wealth
    • What Is the Stock Market? How It Works & How to Invest in It
    • How To Invest in an Index Fund – The Best Index Funds
    • Portfolio Asset Allocation by Age
    • How To Invest Your Emergency Fund
    • Portfolio Diversification – How To Diversify Your Portfolio
    • Dollar Cost Averaging vs. Lump Sum Investing (DCA vs. LSI)
    • How To Invest Your HSA (Health Savings Account)
    • Factor Investing and Factor ETFs – The Ultimate Guide
    • more…
  • Lazy Portfolios
    • All Weather Portfolio
    • Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio
    • HEDGEFUNDIE’s Excellent Adventure
    • Warren Buffett Portfolio
    • Golden Butterfly Portfolio
    • Paul Merriman Ultimate Buy and Hold Portfolio
    • Ben Felix Model Portfolio
    • Permanent Portfolio
    • David Swensen Portfolio
    • 60/40 Portfolio
    • more…
  • Funds
    • VOO vs. VTI – Vanguard S&P 500 or Total Stock Market ETF?
    • The 7 Best International ETFs
    • The 8 Best Small Cap ETFs (4 From Vanguard)
    • The 5 Best REIT ETFs
    • The 5 Best EV ETFs – Electric Vehicles ETFs
    • VIG vs. VYM – Comparing Vanguard’s 2 Popular Dividend ETF’s
    • The Best Vanguard Dividend Funds – 4 Popular ETFs
    • The 5 Best Tech ETFs
    • The 7 Best Small Cap Value ETFs
    • The 6 Best ETFs for Taxable Accounts
    • The 5 Best Emerging Markets ETFs (1 From Vanguard) for 2023
    • more…
  • Leverage
    • What Is a Leveraged ETF and How Do They Work?
    • How To Beat the Market Using Leverage and Index Investing
    • The 9 Best Leveraged ETFs
    • Hedgefundie’s Excellent Adventure
    • Leveraged All Weather Portfolio
    • Leveraged Permanent Portfolio
    • Leveraged Golden Butterfly Portfolio
    • NTSX – Review and Summary
    • TQQQ – Is It A Good Investment?
    • PSLDX – A Review
    • SWAN – A Review
    • RPAR Risk Parity ETF Review
    • more…
  • Dividends
    • The Best M1 Finance Dividend Pie
    • The 11 Best Dividend ETFs
    • The Best Vanguard Dividend Funds – 4 Popular ETFs
    • VIG vs. VYM – Comparing Vanguard’s 2 Popular Dividend ETF’s
    • 8 Reasons Why I’m Not a Dividend Income Investor
    • QYLD – A Harsh Review
    • more…
  • Brokers
    • The 5 Best Stock Brokers
    • The 4 Best Investing Apps
    • M1 Finance Review
    • Brokers with the Lowest Margin Rates
    • M1 Finance vs. Fidelity
    • M1 Finance vs. Vanguard
    • Webull vs. Robinhood
    • Stash vs. Robinhood
    • M1 Borrow Review (How M1’s Margin Loan Works)
    • more…
  • Retirement
    • The 10 Best ETFs for Retirement Portfolios in 2023
    • The 4% Rule for Retirement Withdrawal Rate – A Revisitation
    • Sequence of Return Risk in Retirement Explained
    • Traditional IRA Explained
    • Roth IRA Explained
    • 401k vs. Roth IRA
    • Roth IRA vs. Traditional IRA
    • Backdoor Roth IRA Explained
    • more…
  • My Toolbox

Bill Bernstein Coward’s Portfolio Review and ETFs To Use

Last Updated: July 19, 2024 No Comments – 7 min. read

Bill Bernstein used some historical efficient frontiers to establish what a “coward” investor might use to diversify across geographies and asset types. Here I review his proposed Coward's Portfolio and explore some modifications and some ETFs to use for it.

Interested in more Lazy Portfolios? See the full list here.

Disclosure:  Some of the links on this page are referral links. At no additional cost to you, if you choose to make a purchase or sign up for a service after clicking through those links, I may receive a small commission. This allows me to continue producing high-quality content on this site and pays for the occasional cup of coffee. I have first-hand experience with every product or service I recommend, and I recommend them because I genuinely believe they are useful, not because of the commission I may get. Read more here.

Contents

  • Who Is Bill Bernstein?
  • What Is the Bernstein Coward's Portfolio?
  • Bernstein Coward's Portfolio Performance Backtest
  • Bernstein Coward's Portfolio ETF Pie for M1 Finance
    • Original – Short Term Corporate Bonds
    • Intermediate Treasury Bonds
    • Long Treasury Bonds

Who Is Bill Bernstein?

William (Bill) Bernstein is a retired neurologist, financial theorist, and prolific investing author. Bernstein is all about index investing, asset allocation, and diversification. As am I.

m1 money moves

He is one of the most prolific investing authors out there. Math/theory nerds like me and armchair investors alike will enjoy and get something from all of his investing-related books:

  • The Intelligent Asset Allocator
  • If You Can: How Millennials Can Get Rich Slowly
  • The Four Pillars of Investing: Lessons for Building a Winning Portfolio
  • The Investor's Manifesto: Preparing for Prosperity, Armageddon, and Everything in Between
  • Rational Expectations: Asset Allocation for Investing Adults (more advanced; beginners might want to skip this one)

He also designed the No Brainer Portfolio.

What Is the Bernstein Coward's Portfolio?

Back in 1996, Bernstein suggested that a “coward” investor would diversify broadly across geographies and asset types to be safer. This makes sense. He used efficient frontiers and – in my opinion – some overfitting to arrive at a slice-and-dice 60/40 portfolio that tilts Size snd Value.

The Bernstein Coward's Portfolio is as follows:

  • 15% US Large Cap Blend
  • 10% US Large Cap Value
  • 5% US Small Cap Blend
  • 10% US Small Cap Value
  • 5% REITs
  • 5% Europe
  • 5% Pacific
  • 5% Emerging Markets
  • 40% Short Term Corporate Bonds
bernstein cowards portfolio

Let's look at the Coward's Portfolio's historical performance and then I'll provide some commentary on it.

Bernstein Coward's Portfolio Performance Backtest

Going back to 1995, here's a comparison of the Bernstein Coward's Portfolio and the S&P 500 through June, 2021:

bernstein cowards portfolio performance 1
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

I don't necessarily have a problem with slicing up the equities, but some of them just feel unnecessary and too specific, e.g. Europe and Pacific. If we're diversifying away from the U.S. core with Emerging Markets, why are we also focusing in specifically on European stocks, which would be highly correlated with U.S. stocks? That narrower exposure is also almost certainly more expensive than a broader ex-US Developed Markets fund.

Another odd thing is that for US large caps, we're using blend as a base and then tilting Value, which is fine, but then in small caps we're weighting small cap value more than small cap blend, in which case what's the point of having the latter at all? That tiny exposure to small cap growth stocks is probably not doing anything for us, especially considering it's been the worst performing segment of the stock market historically.

Also, is the 5% to REITs really doing anything? Probably not.

Again, all this is likely simply the result of overfitting.

So let's pretend we used the Coward's Portfolio since 1995. Compared to the S&P 500, we were able to reduce volatility and drawdowns by about 1/3, but we still got about the same return per unit of risk as the S&P 500, as the Sharpe ratios were almost identical. That is, this portfolio and an S&P 500 index fund had the same efficiency. What gives? Well, I'll give you a hint. About 40% of the Coward's Portfolio is severely dragging down its performance. Can you guess which 40% is the culprit?

It's the short-term corporate bonds! This piece is truly bewildering to me. Bernstein is a smart guy. Much smarter than me. But I have to assume he had some sort of Freudian slip when constructing and publishing the Coward's Portfolio, because how could he forget that treasury bonds are objectively superior to corporate bonds in diversified portfolios and that more volatile assets make demonstrably better diversifiers?! Bernstein was clearly building a well-diversified portfolio for the “coward” investor; why did he stop at the bonds?

First, let's address the term (short, in this case) before moving on to the issuer (corporations here instead of the U.S. government).

There are a couple possibilities for the use of short-term bonds, but both can be immediately explained away. One, he intended the portfolio to be for an investor with a very short time horizon of a couple years max. Since we know bond duration should probably be matched to the investment horizon, the use of short bonds might make sense in this case, except for one glaring problem: an investor with a time horizon of 1-2 years should not be holding 60% stocks. So that explanation's out.

Another, more likely possibility is that Bernstein subscribes to Swedroe‘s position of “taking the risk on the equities side” and being safe with bonds. Brief tangent here… I actually know this is true because Bernstein himself has explicitly said it, citing that bonds keep your money safe for your immediate expenses and if your stocks drop, “your bonds are where your money is.”

Well, no. Your total portfolio is where your money is. This is simply mental accounting, and is like covering one eye during a stock market crash, looking at the short-term bonds, and saying “well at least that piece didn't lose money,” which should strike you as irrational. We're always attempting to optimize the portfolio holistically, not myopically with each asset in isolation. The irony here is that Bernstein should know this better than anyone, as he's written several books on asset allocation. Besides, one should probably already have an emergency fund for immediate expenses anyway.

In the interest of full disclosure, I really enjoy Bernstein's writing style and I've gotten great entertainment from his books, but I fundamentally disagree with him on several other points as well. One, he has a weird aversion to ETFs and prefers mutual funds. I assume he just likes to stick with familiarity since he's older, because his reasons cited for this irrational preference hinge on commissions and spreads, which are immaterial concerns in my opinion, particularly with highly liquid funds that we'd be using here anyway. Secondly, he advocates for dollar cost averaging and says it “boosts long-term returns.” We know this is demonstrably untrue over the long term. Similarly, he suggests market timing to buy more stocks during downturns. This is easier said than done, but more importantly, it requires holding cash as “dry powder” on the sidelines, which we also know is suboptimal on average. In fairness, the robust research on these last points came after most of Bernstein's writings.

spend retirement with more

So anyway, back to our investigation of this second possible explanation of the short corporate bonds being for safety. Shorter durations are indeed less volatile and less sensitive to interest rate risk. But this argument should be dead too, because we know government bonds don't possess the credit risk, liquidity risk, and default risk of corporate bonds and are thus inarguably safer.

So we know Bernstein prefers short bonds for their myopic safety, but why corporate bonds instead of treasury bonds? The answer is somewhat simple and unsatisfying: Bernstein just likes the higher yield of corporate bonds. That higher yield compensates investors – though not commensurately, as I've shown elsewhere – for their unique inherent risks just mentioned that treasuries don't have. Bernstein's brief statement straight from The Intelligent Asset Allocator is short and sweet in regards to investors' bond choice: “For the tax-sheltered investor, this is a no-brainer – you go with the highest-yielding short-term corporate bond fund.”

Annoyingly, he moves on directly following that statement, as if it is so self-evident that it requires no explanation. However, several chapters back he was talking about seeking assets with the lowest correlation for the maximum diversification benefit. Once again, he must have forgotten that treasuries do that much better than corporates.

To be fair, Bernstein does seem to have changed his stance on this over the years, because he suggests treasury bonds in his later writings, correctly noting that corporate bonds act a lot like their issuers in market crashes. In his words, “keep it short and keep it high quality.” I agree on the latter, but still not on the former. Maybe in 10 years he will have come around on longer durations for fixed income.

So we've got short-term corporate bonds and we know they're almost certainly not the best choice. Should we just throw our hands up and give up? Nope; let's try grabbing the longer duration treasury bonds from the toolbox. The backtest below has the original Coward's Portfolio that uses short term corporate bonds, and then the one with “ITT” in the name uses intermediate term treasuries, and the one with “LTT” in the name uses long term treasuries:

bernstein cowards portfolio performance 2
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

Now that's more like it. As we'd expect, the one using long treasuries had the smallest drawdown and highest risk-adjusted return. Ironically, this was actually the more “cowardly” approach – giving the bonds more ability to do their job.

As always, I'll include an ETF pie below for the original prescription and for those two additional variations as well.

Bernstein Coward's Portfolio ETF Pie for M1 Finance

M1 Finance is a great choice of broker to implement the Bernstein Coward's Portfolio because it makes regular rebalancing seamless and easy with one click, has zero transaction fees, and incorporates dynamic rebalancing for new deposits. I wrote a comprehensive review of M1 Finance here.

Original – Short Term Corporate Bonds

Again, I definitely would not use this one, but we can construct the original Coward's Portfolio pie with mostly low-cost Vanguard ETFs:

  • VOO – 15%
  • RPV – 10%
  • VB – 5%
  • VIOV – 10%
  • VNQ – 5%
  • VGK – 5%
  • VPL – 5%
  • VWO – 5%
  • VCSH – 40%

You can add this pie to your portfolio on M1 Finance by clicking this link and then clicking “Add to Portfolio.” Investors outside the U.S. can find these ETFs on eToro.

Intermediate Treasury Bonds

Here's the version using intermediate treasuries:

  • VOO – 15%
  • RPV – 10%
  • VB – 5%
  • VIOV – 10%
  • VNQ – 5%
  • VGK – 5%
  • VPL – 5%
  • VWO – 5%
  • VGIT – 40%

Long Treasury Bonds

And here's the version using long treasuries:

  • VOO – 15%
  • RPV – 10%
  • VB – 5%
  • VIOV – 10%
  • VNQ – 5%
  • VGK – 5%
  • VPL – 5%
  • VWO – 5%
  • VGLT – 40%

What do you think of the Coward's Portfolio? Let me know in the comments.


Disclosures: I am long VOO and VWO in my own portfolio.

Interested in more Lazy Portfolios? See the full list here.

Disclaimer:  While I love diving into investing-related data and playing around with backtests, this is not financial advice, investing advice, or tax advice. The information on this website is for informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only. Investment products discussed (ETFs, mutual funds, etc.) are for illustrative purposes only. It is not a research report. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or otherwise transact in any of the products mentioned. I always attempt to ensure the accuracy of information presented but that accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Do your own due diligence. I mention M1 Finance a lot around here. M1 does not provide investment advice, and this is not an offer or solicitation of an offer, or advice to buy or sell any security, and you are encouraged to consult your personal investment, legal, and tax advisors. Hypothetical examples used, such as historical backtests, do not reflect any specific investments, are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be considered an offer to buy or sell any products. All investing involves risk, including the risk of losing the money you invest. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of other parties mentioned. Read my lengthier disclaimer here.

m1


Are you nearing or in retirement? Use my link here to get a free holistic financial plan and to take advantage of 25% exclusive savings on financial planning and wealth management services from fiduciary advisors at Retirable to manage your savings, spend smarter, and navigate key decisions.

retirement peace of mind

Related Posts

  • PFIX ETF Review – Interest Rate Hedge ETF for Fed Rate Hikes in 2025?
  • How Do Banks Make Money? Interest, Fees, & More Explained
  • The 4 Best Cybersecurity ETFs To Buy in 2025
  • The Best Vanguard Growth Funds – 5 Popular ETFs
  • Improving M1 Finance’s Moderately Aggressive Pie

About John Williamson, APMA®

Analytical data nerd, investing enthusiast, fintech consultant, Boglehead, and Oxford comma advocate. I'm not a big fan of social media, but you can find me on LinkedIn and Reddit.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Patreon

Join 5,372 other investors

Take control of your financial future by subscribing to receive exclusive emails with expert tips, news, and notifications of new posts and important updates.

Don't worry, I hate spam too. No ads.

John Williamson, APMA®

Analytical data nerd, investing enthusiast, fintech consultant, Boglehead, and Oxford comma advocate. I'm not a big fan of social media, but you can find me on LinkedIn and Reddit. Read More…

Most Popular

Ray Dalio All Weather Portfolio Review, ETFs, & Leverage (2025)

HEDGEFUNDIE’s Excellent Adventure (UPRO/TMF) – A Summary

Golden Butterfly Portfolio Review and M1 Finance ETF Pie

David Swensen Portfolio (Yale Model) Review and ETFs To Use

55 Lazy Portfolios and Their ETF Pies for M1 Finance (2025)

VIG vs. VYM – Vanguard’s 2 Popular Dividend ETFs (Review)

Warren Buffett ETF Portfolio (90/10) Review and ETFs (2025)

Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio Review and Vanguard ETFs (2025)

Paul Merriman Ultimate Buy and Hold Portfolio Review & ETFs (2025)

The Best M1 Finance Dividend Pie for FIRE & Income Investors

m1 sidebar

retirable

Portfolio Asset Allocation by Age – Beginners To Retirees

The 7 Best Small Cap ETFs (3 From Vanguard) for 2025

9 Best International ETFs To Buy (6 From Vanguard) in 2025

The 3 Best Inverse ETFs to Short the S&P 500 Index in 2025

Ben Felix Model Portfolio (Rational Reminder, PWL) ETFs & Review

Factor Investing and Factor ETFs – The Ultimate Guide

NTSX ETF Review – WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core ETF (90/60)

The Ginger Ale Portfolio (My Own Portfolio) and M1 ETF Pie

TQQQ – Is It A Good Investment for a Long Term Hold Strategy?

QYLD – Avoid This ETF as a Long-Term Investment (A Review)

The 9 Best T Bill ETFs (Treasury Bills) To Park Cash in 2025

JEPI ETF Review – JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF

SPAXX vs. FZFXX, FDIC, FCASH, FDRXX – Fidelity Core Position

Recent Posts

M1 Earn High Yield Cash Account Review – 4% APY (2025)

RSBY ETF Review – Return Stacked® U.S. Bonds & Futures Yield ETF

1 ETF for Life to Get Rich? It’s Not One You’d Guess…

How to Get 35% off a New Tesla Model Y (1.99% APR Financing Promo)

M1 Finance New Dividend Reinvestment Features Are Here! (Sneak Peek)

RSSY ETF Review – Return Stacked® U.S. Stocks & Futures Yield ETF

RSBT ETF Review – Return Stacked® Bonds & Managed Futures ETF

RSST ETF Review – Return Stacked® US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF

CAOS ETF Review – Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

How to Get 33% off a New Tesla Model Y (0.99% APR Promo)

CALF ETF Review – Pacer U.S. Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF

Is THIS the Best Portfolio?

AVMA ETF Review – Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (60/40 + Factors)

COWZ ETF Review – Pacer U.S. Cash Cows 100 ETF

BOXX ETF Review – Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF

View All...

Footer

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Patreon

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure

OptimizedPortfolio.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive email updates when a new post is published.

Don't worry, I hate spam too. No ads.

About - My Toolbox - Privacy - Terms - Contact


Copyright © 2025 OptimizedPortfolio.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Ok, Got ItReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT