• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Optimized Portfolio

Investing and Personal Finance

  • Beginners Start Here
  • Investing 101
    • Beginners Start Here – 10 Steps To Start Building Wealth
    • What Is the Stock Market? How It Works & How to Invest in It
    • How To Invest in an Index Fund – The Best Index Funds
    • Portfolio Asset Allocation by Age
    • How To Invest Your Emergency Fund
    • Portfolio Diversification – How To Diversify Your Portfolio
    • Dollar Cost Averaging vs. Lump Sum Investing (DCA vs. LSI)
    • How To Invest Your HSA (Health Savings Account)
    • Factor Investing and Factor ETFs – The Ultimate Guide
    • more…
  • Lazy Portfolios
    • All Weather Portfolio
    • Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio
    • HEDGEFUNDIE’s Excellent Adventure
    • Warren Buffett Portfolio
    • Golden Butterfly Portfolio
    • Paul Merriman Ultimate Buy and Hold Portfolio
    • Ben Felix Model Portfolio
    • Permanent Portfolio
    • David Swensen Portfolio
    • 60/40 Portfolio
    • more…
  • Brokerage Reviews
    • The 5 Best Stock Brokers
    • The 4 Best Investing Apps
    • M1 Finance Review
    • Brokers with the Lowest Margin Rates
    • M1 Finance vs. Fidelity
    • M1 Finance vs. Vanguard
    • Webull vs. Robinhood
    • Stash vs. Robinhood
    • M1 Borrow Review (How M1’s Margin Loan Works)
    • more…
  • ETFs
    • VOO vs. VTI – Vanguard S&P 500 or Total Stock Market ETF?
    • The 7 Best International ETFs
    • The 8 Best Small Cap ETFs (4 From Vanguard)
    • The 5 Best REIT ETFs
    • The 5 Best EV ETFs – Electric Vehicles ETFs
    • VIG vs. VYM – Comparing Vanguard’s 2 Popular Dividend ETF’s
    • The Best Vanguard Dividend Funds – 4 Popular ETFs
    • The 5 Best Tech ETFs
    • The 7 Best Small Cap Value ETFs
    • The 6 Best ETFs for Taxable Accounts
    • The 5 Best Emerging Markets ETFs (1 From Vanguard) for 2022
    • more…
  • Leverage
    • What Is a Leveraged ETF and How Do They Work?
    • How To Beat the Market Using Leverage and Index Investing
    • The 9 Best Leveraged ETFs
    • Hedgefundie’s Excellent Adventure
    • Leveraged All Weather Portfolio
    • Leveraged Permanent Portfolio
    • Leveraged Golden Butterfly Portfolio
    • NTSX – Review and Summary
    • TQQQ – Is It A Good Investment?
    • PSLDX – A Review
    • SWAN – A Review
    • RPAR Risk Parity ETF Review
    • more…
  • Dividends
    • The Best M1 Finance Dividend Pie
    • The 11 Best Dividend ETFs
    • The Best Vanguard Dividend Funds – 4 Popular ETFs
    • VIG vs. VYM – Comparing Vanguard’s 2 Popular Dividend ETF’s
    • 8 Reasons Why I’m Not a Dividend Income Investor
    • QYLD – A Harsh Review
    • more…
  • Bonds
    • The Best Vanguard Bond Funds – 11 Popular ETFs
    • The 11 Best Treasury Bond ETFs
    • Treasury Bonds vs. Corporate Bonds
    • The 3 Best TIPS ETFs
    • The 5 Best High Yield Bond Funds for Income
    • The 3 Best Municipal Bond ETFs
    • How To Buy Bonds Online: The Ultimate Guide
    • The Best Bond Funds Out There – 13 ETFs
    • The 3 Best Corporate Bond ETFs
    • more…

SPD ETF Review – Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF

Last Updated: March 22, 2022 6 Comments – 6 min. read

SPD offers exposure to U.S. large cap stocks while protecting from severe downturns with put options. I review it here.

Disclosure:  Some of the links on this page are referral links. At no additional cost to you, if you choose to make a purchase or sign up for a service after clicking through those links, I may receive a small commission. This allows me to continue producing high-quality, ad-free content on this site and pays for the occasional cup of coffee. I have first-hand experience with every product or service I recommend, and I recommend them because I genuinely believe they are useful, not because of the commission I get if you decide to purchase through my links. Read more here.

Contents

  • Introduction – What Is SPD and How Does It Work?
  • SPD vs. NTSX vs. SWAN vs. S&P 500 – Historical Performance
  • Is SPD a Good Investment? Maybe.

Introduction – What Is SPD and How Does It Work?

SPD is an ETF from Simplify designed to provide broad equity exposure to U.S. stocks while also offering some downside protection for market crashes. It’s called the Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF. In a nutshell, SPD is holding a basket of U.S. large cap stocks – the S&P 500 Index (the largest 500 U.S. companies) in this case – and then overlaying an actively managed options rolling strategy. This fund launched in late 2020 and has a little over $350 million in assets. It has an expense ratio of 0.29%.

To get its equity exposure, SPD takes 98% of its assets and buys an S&P 500 index fund. Pretty straightforward. Then it takes the remaining 2% and buys cheap, out-of-the-money (OTM) put options on the same index, effectively providing an insurance parachute in the event of an extreme drawdown. That is, when the market crashes, the value of the put options goes up. The options are actively selected and rolled.

Remember, a put option gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy the underlying security at a specified price (the strike price) within a given time period. The buyer of a put option is hoping the market declines, as that causes the value of the put option to increase.

SPD vs. NTSX vs. SWAN vs. S&P 500 – Historical Performance

SPD is roughly in the same family as other multi-asset funds offering downside protection such as NTSX and SWAN, though these funds use treasury bonds to provide that protection, whereas SPD uses put options. I’ve compared SPD, NTSX, SWAN, and the S&P 500 below. Take this backtest with a handful of salt. Remember, SPD has only been around since September, 2020, which is a shame; it would have been great to see how it behaved just 6 months earlier during the crash in March, 2020.

spd vs ntsx vs swan vs s&p 500
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

Note how SPD delivered slightly higher risk-adjusted but lower general returns than the S&P 500. Also note how SPD’s volatility and max drawdown were not significantly different from the S&P 500. And we would probably expect that, as only 2% of the funds assets are going to OTM put options and there was not a significant drawdown during the backtested period.

SPD outperformed NTSX and SWAN over the backtested time period because their intermediate treasury bonds suffered during that time. Again, with such a short time period, this backtest shouldn’t mean much.

Is SPD a Good Investment? Maybe.

Here’s the gist. We would expect SPD to underperform the S&P 500 in a bull, sideways, or even a slightly down market. Specifically, we can estimate that underperformance at about 2%, the cost of the options that expire worthless. Said another way, we’re participating in 98% of market beta (market risk) and thus 98% of the market’s returns.

We would expect SPD to outperform the S&P 500 in a period with severe drawdowns. In fact, the deeper the drawdown is, the more SPD can profit from it. This relationship is not linear, which is why the word “convexity” is in the name. The backtest above shows a time period with pretty shallow drawdowns, which is why SPD has delivered a slightly higher risk-adjusted but lower general return compared to the S&P 500.

Basically, we’re sacrificing 2% exposure to stocks to pay an insurance premium – plus fees – for a policy that will only pay out in an extreme crash. In that sense, SPD is more attractive for short-term and/or risk-averse investors. The long-term investor holding SPD for many years will likely pay more for the premium and fees than the insurance payout is worth. In other words, that insurance would just be a performance drag in an extended bull market. Simplify themselves maintain that this is a “modest drag” that “can be sustained over strategic horizons.”

An important distinction to note is that the put options will only pay off in the event of a severe drawdown. That means a major market crash. SPD isn’t going to do much for small corrections. Simplify maintain that extreme market movements will be more normal going forward, emphasizing the need for greater diversification and protection. Further, they suggest that a hedging strategy using derivatives provides “new exposure that can help position portfolios for these new normals in ways traditional assets cannot.”

This may not be untrue. The tails of the S&P 500 have been gradually fattening over the past couple decades. The probability of extreme but seemingly rare market events is called “tail risk,” as they are the tails of a normal probability distribution. Fatter tails means a greater probability/frequency of such extreme events, the negative instances of which are called black swans. SPD aims to hedge against such tail events.

Unfortunately, we’re also forced to pay a fee that is 10x that of the very fund that SPD holds for the active management of the 2% of SPD’s assets used for the option overlay. In fairness, that fee may be worth the time and effort that would be involved in rolling the OTM put options yourself. For the other 98%, SPD is straightforwardly holding the fund IVV, the popular S&P 500 index fund from iShares that has a tiny fee of 0.03%, which you can go buy yourself. Nothing special going on there. Note that you’d be missing out entirely on small- and mid-cap stocks there, which we would expect to outperform large caps over the long term.

But there’s another important argument that may make SPD’s options overlay strategy attractive right now. At the time of writing, interest rates and subsequent bond yields are at historic lows, while inflation is very high. This means holding bonds over the short term carries with it an expectation of low or even negative real returns. This unique environment may also impede treasuries’ ability to hedge against black swans. I don’t try to time the market, but SPD may indeed be a sensible alternative investment for risk-averse investors with a short time horizon.

I have an appreciation for other multi-asset funds for enhanced asset allocation like NTSX and SWAN. The good news is there’s no reason why we can’t use both NTSX’s idea of treasury bonds and SPD’s idea of put options. Simplify themselves actually explicitly support this idea, suggesting that this would effectively be “diversifying one’s diversifiers.” Simplify advocate for simply replacing one’s entire equity position with SPD. Using that and the zero-coupon STRIPS bond fund EDV from Vanguard to roughly approximate NTSX’s treasury futures exposure, we can use 90% SPD and 10% EDV to take advantage of both forms of downside protection. Even though these incredibly short backtests don’t really mean much, here’s how that would have worked out since SPD’s inception:

spd edv backtest
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

Again, the young accumulator with a long time horizon probably has no need for a fund like SPD, at least until near retirement. I’m reminded of the famous quote from Peter Lynch:

“Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections, or trying to anticipate corrections, than has been lost in corrections themselves.”

In other words, investors sometimes spend too much time worrying about how to protect the downside at the expense of participating in the upside. For a 30+ year investing horizon, the latter, which is the whole reason we’re investing in the first place, should be the focus, at least until near the end of the investing horizon. Historically, major crashes of the severity required for SPD to do its magic have only occurred every 7 years on average. If that trend continues, SPD holders may have to sacrifice about 2% per year for those 7 years in between extreme market events, which may add up to a significant drag. 2% compounded over 7 years is about 15%.

That said, we know that investors tend to severely overestimate their tolerance for risk, and I think I prefer SPD over all these new, popular, multi-asset, derivatives-based “income” funds like QYLD, NUSI, DIVO, JEPI, etc. With bonds facing a significant headwind in the near future, SPD may indeed be a valuable addition to the portfolio for the retiree or the investor with a low tolerance for risk, effectively “diversifying your diversifiers,” as Simplify suggests. I’ll be curious to see how SPD performs in the next major market crash.

What do you think of SPD? Let me know in the comments.


Disclosures: I am long NTSX and EDV in my own portfolio.

Interested in more Lazy Portfolios? See the full list here.

Disclaimer:  While I love diving into investing-related data and playing around with backtests, I am in no way a certified expert. I have no formal financial education. I am not a financial advisor, portfolio manager, or accountant. This is not financial advice, investing advice, or tax advice. The information on this website is for informational and recreational purposes only. Investment products discussed (ETFs, mutual funds, etc.) are for illustrative purposes only. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or otherwise transact in any of the products mentioned. Do your own due diligence. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. Read my lengthier disclaimer here.

m1 finance get started

Related Posts

  • VT vs. VTI – Global Stock Market vs. Total U.S. Stock Market
  • M1 Spend Review – M1 Finance Checking Account & Debit Card
  • The 3 Best Corporate Bond ETFs (2 From Vanguard)
  • SPAXX vs. FDIC vs. FDRXX vs. FZFXX – Fidelity Core Position
  • Improving M1 Finance’s Aggressive Portfolio Expert Pie

About John Williamson

Analytical and entrepreneurial-minded data nerd, usability enthusiast, Boglehead, and Oxford comma advocate. I lead the Paid Search marketing efforts at Gild Group. I'm not a big fan of social media, but you can find me on LinkedIn and Reddit.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Rob² says

    January 14, 2022 at 5:39 pm

    Thank you for the e-mail message to read this article, I finally got to it today. I put $100 each, back in June 2021, into SPD, it’s opposite SPUC, the combo SPYC, NTSX, and a couple variations of HedgeFundie just to watch them as my investing journey unfolds. I literally noticed your assessment of how it doesn’t really grow during up or sideways periods. When things start going down, it does too, but not as harshly. For example, up to Christmas and New Year’s, the HedgeFundies and NTSX were looking best. Now in the last 2+ weeks, SPUC, then SPYC, then SPD held up best. I think I agree with you – I’m not going be able to guess & time the ‘black swan’ that makes SPD worth it.

    As always, thank you for a well-written article.

    Reply
  2. Milan Jurich says

    December 19, 2021 at 10:48 am

    Is SPD essentially attempting to replicate the work of Mark Spitznagle’s Universa Hedge Fund in terms of risk mitigation … but for the DIY’r? Would it make sense for a pre-retiree to pair SPD with a fund such as SWAN to reduce Drawdown risk )or perhaps a little more EDV than 10% combined with SPD as you’ve shown?). Thank you for the analysis.

    Reply
    • John Williamson says

      December 19, 2021 at 2:04 pm

      Same idea but to a lesser degree, yes. Yea pairing with bonds would be “diversifying your diversifiers,” as Simplify said.

      Reply
  3. Robert says

    December 7, 2021 at 6:56 pm

    I’ve held this one for a while about 20% of my money and decided to also add NTSX to be part of that 20% to ensure that if one hedge doesn’t work well at some point, maybe the other one will. SPD relies largely on large changes in volatility causing the options to increase in values. Therefore there are situations where it could fail such as the market slowly going down with volatility not spiking much. Hard and fast crashes are where it will most likely do the best. There are some tools on the simplify site that allow you to simulate the effect volatility will have on the value of the options, you just need to pretend to be someone with a title you might not have when you sign up for an account because they give more information to you then.

    Reply
  4. Mike says

    December 7, 2021 at 1:54 pm

    It’s not clear to me how much of an upside will only having 2% put options have during a major crash. Looking at Universa’s 2020 investor letter, they recommend their customers to allocate 3.33% of the portfolio to the tail hedge. In March 2020 (during the COVID crash) that hedge returned +3,612%. The YTD CAGR of Universa Tail Hedge (3.33%) + SPX (96.67%) was 11.5%, compared to 7.9% of SPX alone for the periods 03/2008 – 03/2020.

    This seems in line with what Mark Spitznagel wrote in some of his earlier essays, where he expected the hedge to grow at least by tenfold (“tenbagger”) in case SPX drops by 15% or more, so you get back 30%+ from your tail hedge, offsetting your losses, and allowing you to “DCA in” to the now cheaper stocks. Over the long term, sustaining small losses due to the hedge is more than made up for by the nonlinear payoff in the major crashes. This is why *over the long term* your CAGR should actually be slightly greater with a proper tail hedge than without one. This is due to volatility drag, as the geometric mean (your CAGR, basically) can be approximated by: arithmetic mean – sigma^2/2, where sigma is the standard deviation (“volatility”). So volatility can really hurt you and make it harder to recover as the drawdowns are steeper than the upturns, and it is it takes more time to recover from them.

    I also believe that Universa are doing additional options trading to offset the costs of buying the puts, which reduces the drag even further – something that the passive Simplify fund is not doing.

    One last thing, Simplify also have a tail-hedge-only fund called CYA, so you can just buy it in addition to your existing equities portfolio without having to buy their re-packaging of S&P500.

    Reply
    • Robert says

      December 7, 2021 at 7:04 pm

      Sounds like Universa is doing something way more advanced because I heavily researched SPD and hold a bit of it, and even in best-case scenario it doesn’t seem like it will do anywhere as well as Universa, but also I don’t meet hedge fund requirements to invest in them.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to receive email updates when a new post is published.

Don't worry, I hate spam too. No ads.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Reddit

Most Popular

Ray Dalio All Weather Portfolio Review, ETF’s, & Leverage

HEDGEFUNDIE’s Excellent Adventure (UPRO/TMF) – A Summary

Golden Butterfly Portfolio Review and M1 Finance ETF Pie

David Swensen Portfolio (Yale Model) Review and ETFs To Use

Harry Browne Permanent Portfolio Review, ETFs, & Leverage (2022)

Corporate Bonds vs. Government Bonds (Treasuries) – The Showdown

VIG vs. VYM – Vanguard’s 2 Popular Dividend ETFs (Review)

Warren Buffett ETF Portfolio (90/10) Review and ETFs (2022)

The 60/40 Portfolio Review and ETF Pie for M1 Finance

Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio Review and Vanguard ETFs To Use

m1 sidebar

Paul Merriman Ultimate Buy and Hold Portfolio Review, M1 Pie (2022)

Lowest Margin Rates Brokers (2022 Comparison)

M1 Finance vs. Vanguard Brokerage Comparison [2022 Review]

M1 Finance vs. Fidelity Brokerage Comparison [2022 Review]

The Best M1 Finance Dividend Pie for FIRE & Income Investors

Portfolio Asset Allocation by Age – Beginners To Retirees

The 5 Best Stock Brokers Online for Investing (2022 Review)

The 4 Best Investing Apps for Beginners (2022 Review)

The 7 Best Small Cap ETFs (3 From Vanguard) for 2022

The 6 Best REIT ETFs To Invest in Real Estate for 2022

The 6 Best Tech ETFs To Buy Tech Stocks in 2022

9 Best Clean Energy ETFs To Go Green in Your Portfolio (2022)

The 12 Best Small Cap Value ETFs (3 From Vanguard) for 2022

Why, How, & Where To Invest Your Emergency Fund To Beat Inflation

VOO vs. VTI – Vanguard’s S&P 500 and Total Stock Market ETFs

9 Best International ETFs To Buy (6 From Vanguard) in 2022

Ben Felix Model Portfolio (Rational Reminder, PWL) ETFs & Review

Factor Investing and Factor ETFs – The Ultimate Guide

Gone Fishin’ Portfolio Review (Alexander Green) & ETFs (2022)

TQQQ – Is It A Good Investment for a Long Term Hold Strategy?

Recent Posts

Tail Risk – What It Is and How To Hedge Against It

I Bonds (U.S. Government Savings Bonds) – The Ultimate Guide

JEPI ETF Review – JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF

Sharpe Ratio vs. Sortino vs. Calmar – Risk Adjusted Return

Investing Risk Explained (My Take on Portfolio Risk & Volatility)

HNDL ETF Review – Strategy Shares NASDAQ 7HANDL™ Index ETF

NUSI ETF Review – An Income-Focused Option Collar ETF

3 Best SPAC ETFs To Invest in SPACs in 2022 – But Should You?

VOO vs. VOOV vs. VOOG – Vanguard S&P 500, Value, or Growth?

VXUS vs. VEU – Which Vanguard Total International ETF?

VT vs. VTI – Global Stock Market vs. Total U.S. Stock Market

RPAR Risk Parity ETF Review – An All Weather Portfolio ETF?

PSLDX – A Review of the PIMCO StocksPLUS® Long Duration Fund

The 7 Best Value ETFs To Capture Value Stocks in 2022

SWAN – A Review of the Amplify BlackSwan ETF for Downturns

View All...

Footer

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Reddit

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure

OptimizedPortfolio.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive email updates when a new post is published.

Don't worry, I hate spam too. No ads.

About - My Toolbox - Privacy - Terms - Contact


Copyright © 2022 OptimizedPortfolio.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Ok, Got ItReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT