Should You Avoid State-Owned Enterprises in Your Portfolio?

State-owned enterprises typically have inherently lower operating efficiency due to compromised business interests. It may be prudent to avoid them in your international portfolio. Here we’ll see what the data has to say.

Disclosure:  Some of the links on this page are referral links. At no additional cost to you, if you choose to make a purchase or sign up for a service after clicking through those links, I may receive a small commission. This allows me to continue producing high-quality, ad-free content on this site and pays for the occasional cup of coffee. I have first-hand experience with every product or service I recommend, and I recommend them because I genuinely believe they are useful, not because of the commission I get if you decide to purchase through my links. Read more here.

What Are State-Owned Enterprises?

State-owned enterprises, or SOEs, refer to companies with at least partial government ownership. The relevant financial products typically define an SOE as having greater than 20% government ownership, but an SOE could really have 1% government ownership or 100% government ownership. Often, the state has a controlling share of an SOE, though this isn’t always the case.

SOEs aren’t really prevalent in free economies like the United States, where publicly traded companies are largely free to operate as they wish without government intervention, though we do still have government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

SOEs are much more common in Emerging Markets like China. Most SOEs are remnants of communist regimes that have now embraced capitalism. Naturally, SOEs are typically involved with energy, materials, financials, etc. as these comprise a country’s banking system, infrastructures, and natural resources. Examples include mining companies, public transportation providers, postal services, and utilities. SOEs like these are sometimes created solely to boost the economy of a developing country, e.g. oil in Brazil.

According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the assets of state-owned enterprises worldwide is $45 trillion.

Advantages of SOEs

While SOEs may sound bad so far, there can be economic advantages.

Some SOEs gain the status of being a legal, government-backed monopoly, effectively eliminating any competition.

The stock returns of SOEs also tend to be more stable (less volatile), which may be desirable for some risk-averse investors.

Disadvantages and Risks of SOEs

State-owned enterprises can be propped up by government funding to prevent them from failing, particularly when they’re deemed necessary to a country’s infrastructure, such as the U.S. Postal Service, which has been allowed to operate at a loss for extended periods. This is particularly prevalent in China, where a free market would otherwise cause the business to fail. Even worse, individual heads of government may use the state’s controlling share in a company to pursue personal goals.

This government ownership naturally leads to decreased operating efficiency, as managers are serving two opposing interests: government and shareholders. Bureaucracy and political interests are usually at odds with shareholder value maximization. Unfortunately, it is more likely that the governments’ interests win out. which means lower profits.

The prevailing view is thus that these opposing interests invariably lead to lower stock returns on average, and that investors should invest in companies with their interests in mind, i.e. companies that are not SOEs.

Let’s see what the empirical evidence has to say.

State-Owned Enterprises – Fundamentals and Performance Data

If the theoretical basis for lower expected returns of state-owned enterprises is sound, we would expect it to show up both in fundamental valuation metrics and in the empirical historical stock performance.

The first obvious place to look is historical returns between SOE and non-SOE firms. To show this, WisdomTree took the Emerging Markets universe and looked at cumulative returns for broad market-cap-weighted portfolios of SOEs and non-SOEs, with an SOE being firms with greater than 20% state ownership:

As. you can see, the data greatly favor non-SOEs. We would expect this performance to show up in some difference in fundamental metrics for quality and/or efficiency. And indeed it has, showing up in the difference of Return on Assets:

Interestingly, the gap seems to be widening in recent years too.

Avoiding SOEs in Your Portfolio

So we can see why we might want to avoid SOEs, but how can we do that and remain globally diversified in stocks?

WisdomTree themselves created a first-of-its-kind fund to capture Emerging Markets while excluding SOEs, defined as firms with greater than 20% government ownership. The ticker is $XSOE. Here’s how the fund has performed vs. the broader Emerging Markets index since the fund’s inception in 2015:

Note though that the sector exposure varies significantly between SOEs and non-SOEs in Emerging Markets:

WisdomTree notes that “it is prudent to consider the exposure of SOEs compared to non-SOEs in the broad MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Since the end of 2007, the benchmark has seen an evolution of exposures. SOEs continue to occupy a large share of the market’s overall exposure. Worth noting is the growth of the Information Technology and Consumer sectors over this period, particularly among non-SOEs. It is no coincidence that these “new economy” sectors have been among the key drivers of broad EM returns and overall growth of the market, as some of the more traditional, “old economy” sectors, such as Energy and Financials, have lost market share and continue to be the largest sectors of SOEs.”

Investors still wanting some exposure to SOEs and the “old economy” sectors in Emerging Markets can hedge their bets by utilizing both $XSOE and a broad Emerging Markets index fund like $VWO.

Also keep in mind that with the sector weightings above, XSOE naturally tilts toward growth stocks, and Growth has performed particularly well over the backtested period. This may be desirable if the rest of your portfolio heavily tilts Value, but again it may be a good idea to still maintain some reasonable exposure to SOEs in Emerging Markets to keep those Value-oriented sectors like Utilities.

It’s entirely possible that this recent outperformance was due to these different sector weightings and Growth tilt, but I still like the idea of avoiding SOEs on a fundamental basis.

Conclusion

Given the intuitive logic of decreased operational efficiency and the data, it may be prudent to avoid or at least underweight state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in one’s international investment portfolio. XSOE from WisdomTree is a fund that captures Emerging Markets while selectively excluding SOEs, defined as having greater than 20% state ownership. The sector exposure of XSOE will likely differ from “traditional” Emerging Markets funds that do include SOEs, so it may be wise to keep minimal exposure to maintain sector diversification.

How do you feel about SOEs vs. non-SOEs? Let me know in the comments.

---

Disclosures:  I am long XSOE and VWO.

Disclaimer:  While I love diving into investing-related data and playing around with backtests, I am in no way a certified expert. I have no formal financial education. I am not a financial advisor, portfolio manager, or accountant. This is not financial advice, investing advice, or tax advice. The information on this website is for informational and recreational purposes only. Investment products discussed (ETFs, mutual funds, etc.) are for illustrative purposes only. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or otherwise transact in any of the products mentioned. Do your own due diligence. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. Read my lengthier disclaimer here.